[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y51me9lr.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 16:22:56 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:42:42 -0800
>
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>
>> sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
>> have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
>> skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
>>
>> Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can
>> trigger OOM while the intent was only to try the high order
>> allocations, then fallback to order-0 allocations.
>>
>> We had various reports from unexpected regressions.
>>
>> According to David, setting __GFP_NORETRY should be fine,
>> as the asynchronous compaction is still enabled, and this
>> will prevent OOM from kicking as in :
> ...
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
> Applied, do we want this for -stable?
The first hunk goes back to 3.12 and the second hunk goes back to 3.8.
I think so. The change is safe and this class of problem can cause an
external attack to trigger an OOM on your box, by controlling the packet
flow.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists