linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Qualcomm QUP SPI controller support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:52:34 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Alok Chauhan <alokc@...eaurora.org>,
	Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>,
	Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>,
	Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Qualcomm QUP SPI controller support

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:32:07AM -0600, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:52:33AM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:

To repeat what I said in my earlier e-mail please delete irrelevant
context from your mails so any new content you are including is
discoverable.

> > Did you see any particular issue with the implementation 
> > or this is just because this platform didn't have support 
> > for power management?  

> The platform doesn't have support for PM right now.  So it's probably better to
> remove all this and revisit later when it is in place.

No, runtime PM does not require any platform support at all and is good
practice - look at what the driver is doing with it, it's useful as-is.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)