[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140207175708.GK1757@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:57:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Alok Chauhan <alokc@...eaurora.org>,
Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>,
Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Qualcomm QUP SPI controller support
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:46:43AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:31:08PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That's not ARM only and I thought we were getting generic versions of it
> > anyway? ARMv8, MIPS, Microblaze, Hexagon and SH also define it.
> Okay, that's fair. I'm only vaguely familiar with the generic _relaxed
> variants, but until they land, how do we appropriately declare the
> dependency to prevent breaking COMPILE_TEST builds on architectures that
> don't have them? Or should we either bother?
> Do we need to introduce a HAVE_RELAXED_IO_ACCESSORS selected by those
> architectures with support?
I think that or just getting generic versions done would be the way
forwards. Right now it's a bit of a shambles.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists