linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v2 driver-core-next] kernfs: prepare for cgroup's kernfs conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140208181727.GA10975@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sat, 8 Feb 2014 13:17:27 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 driver-core-next] kernfs: prepare for cgroup's
 kernfs conversion

Hello,

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:17:46AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:08:56AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:07:51AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 04:12:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Ok, I should have now applied all of these, and hopefully in the correct
> > > > order.  If I got anything wrong, please let me know.
> > > 
> > > Everything looks good to me.
> > 
> > Ooh, JFYI, I'm pulling driver-core-next into cgroup for-3.15 so that
> > cgroup kernfs conversion can be put on top of it.
> 
> That's fine with me.  Do you feel kernfs is good enough now for other
> subsystems to use?  I want to port debugfs to it when ready.

API-wise, I think, or at least hope, so.  I've been running quite a
few tests with the converted cgroup and haven't found anything
critical yet, so the outlook isn't too bad.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/