linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] async: async device driver probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140208182729.GB10892@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:27:29 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	falcon@...zu.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] async: async device driver probing

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:05:38PM +0800, falcon@...zu.com wrote:
> From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
> 
> [*Note*: NOT applicable, only for comments.]
> 
> To async the slow driver probing function of some devices, the device probing
> support is modified to support async scheduling.
> 
> In order to async your driver probing function, please mask the async_probe
> flag to 1, and to make sure one asynced probing is executed before an specified
> point, please call async_synchronize_full() in that point..
> 
> Usage:
> 
> 	static struct i2c_driver test_driver = {
> 		.driver = {
> 			.name   = TEST_DEV_NAME,
> 			.owner  = THIS_MODULE,
> 	+               .async_probe = 1,
> 		},

Why is this needed, we have defered probing and the container stuff, so
what problem is this solving?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/