[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqV+5T5jFgjWZ9zkbC3Oijq=7fVBhM9BDLQtDa_c8Yftg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:42:15 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] spi: pl022: Simplify clock handling
On 4 February 2014 20:19, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:50PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Make use of clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare to simplify
>> code. No functional change.
>
> I went ahead and applied this since it looks good and seems like an
> unrelated cleanup to the runtime PM stuff which seems to be where the
> interdependencies are - thanks! It's on a separate branch with the
> already applied change so if it does need to be cross merged we can do
> that easily or even drop the branch.
Thanks Mark, it seems like a good approach.
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists