linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: handle gate clock for misplaced TRIMINFO register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:07:23 +0000
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@...il.com>
Cc:	Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"eduardo.valentin@...com" <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"amit.daniel@...sung.com" <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
	"kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"b.zolnierkie@...sung.com" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	"cpgs@...sung.com" <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: handle gate clock for misplaced
 TRIMINFO register

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:50:01AM +0000, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> Hello Mark,
> 
> On 10 February 2014 16:03, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:42:34PM +0000, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> >> On Exynos5420 the TMU(4) for GPU has a seperate clock enable bit from
> >> the other TMU channels(0 ~ 3). Hence, accessing TRIMINFO for base_second
> >> should be acompanied by enabling the respective clock.
> >>
> >> This patch which allow for a "clk_sec" clock to be specified in the
> >> device-tree which will be ungated when accessing the TRIMINFO register.
> >
> > Missing binding document update? Or was "clk_sec" originally in the
> > binding but unused?
> >
> > The code seems to expect "tmu_apbif_sec" as the clock name in the DT,
> > but this isn't mentioned in the commit message.
> >
> > I grepped Documentation/devicetree in mainline, but found no reference
> > of either.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.
> This CL is to be abandoned.

Ok.

> 
> As mentioned in the previous replies to this patch.
> The changes in this patched were merged with
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html
> 
> The latest patch set can be found at.
> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15163.html
> 2. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15164.html
> 3. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html
> 4. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html

I responded here because of your ping message on 2014-02-07. The latest
patches seem to have been posted before that. Was the ping misplaced or
have I misunderstood?

Thanks,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/