[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHfPSqCMvygUwa3o-qeuf-Yxcdzmbq_FgS6q5MJtmeeKFHo3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:39:39 +0530
From: Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@...il.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"eduardo.valentin@...com" <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"amit.daniel@...sung.com" <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
"kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"b.zolnierkie@...sung.com" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"cpgs@...sung.com" <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: handle gate clock for misplaced TRIMINFO register
Hello Mark,
On 10 February 2014 16:37, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:50:01AM +0000, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
>> Hello Mark,
>>
>> On 10 February 2014 16:03, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:42:34PM +0000, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>> >> On Exynos5420 the TMU(4) for GPU has a seperate clock enable bit from
>> >> the other TMU channels(0 ~ 3). Hence, accessing TRIMINFO for base_second
>> >> should be acompanied by enabling the respective clock.
>> >>
>> >> This patch which allow for a "clk_sec" clock to be specified in the
>> >> device-tree which will be ungated when accessing the TRIMINFO register.
>> >
>> > Missing binding document update? Or was "clk_sec" originally in the
>> > binding but unused?
>> >
>> > The code seems to expect "tmu_apbif_sec" as the clock name in the DT,
>> > but this isn't mentioned in the commit message.
>> >
>> > I grepped Documentation/devicetree in mainline, but found no reference
>> > of either.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Mark.
>> This CL is to be abandoned.
>
> Ok.
>
>>
>> As mentioned in the previous replies to this patch.
>> The changes in this patched were merged with
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html
>>
>> The latest patch set can be found at.
>> 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15163.html
>> 2. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15164.html
>> 3. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html
>> 4. http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg15165.html
>
> I responded here because of your ping message on 2014-02-07. The latest
> patches seem to have been posted before that. Was the ping misplaced or
> have I misunderstood?
It was my bad, I replied to the patches in that series and i myself forgot that
it was abandoned patch. Sorry.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists