linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb1T1GCqEpy9=fPp4hYQErLYiQqJezrFhoS3x1MU=0S9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:09:29 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:

> it seems like at least BACKLIGHT_LP8788 is missing a corresponding
> dependency as well.
>
> I have applied Sascha's patch to remove the obsolete HAVE_PWM symbol,
> and this will fix at least the build issues. However it will also cause
> the driver to fail at runtime because the pwm_*() functions won't work.

So it definately needs that API, not just stubs.

But isn't it proper for Kconfig to allow you to break things
like that by configuring out stuff and have stubs come in?

I'm a bit torn here.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/