lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:21:09 +0800
From:	Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linaro-acpi <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff
 to make it more arch-independent

2014-02-08 21:10 GMT+08:00 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>:
> _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h  |    5 +----
>  arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c       |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h   |   19 +------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   19 +------------------
>  5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index d651102..d2b8b9d 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -152,10 +152,7 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
>  #endif
>
>  static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> -{
> -       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> -}
> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>
>  #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 07d209c..d71f64a 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -1014,3 +1014,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unregister_ioapic);
>   * TBD when when IA64 starts to support suspend...
>   */
>  int acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void) { return 0; }
> +
> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> +{
> +       /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> +       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;

Hi Hanjun:
            You can write like this.
            buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD | ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;

> +       if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> +               /*
> +                * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> +                * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> +                * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> +                */
> +               buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> +
> +       }
> +
> +       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> index c8c1e70..e9f71bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -147,24 +147,7 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
>                 c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
>  }
>
> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> -{
> -       struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
> -
> -       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> -
> -       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
> -               buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
> -
> -       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
> -               buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
> -        */
> -       if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> -               buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
> -}
> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>
>  #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> index e69182f..aa9aed9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,37 @@
>  #include <asm/mwait.h>
>  #include <asm/special_insns.h>
>
> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> +{
> +       struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
> +
> +       /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> +       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
> +       if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> +               /*
> +                * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> +                * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> +                * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> +                */
> +               buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> +
> +       }
> +
> +       buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;

This is not right. ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP contians ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH and
ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH. boot_option_idle_override is meaningless here.

You should keep original order and put the check at last.


> +
> +       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
> +               buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
> +
> +       if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
> +               buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
> +        */
> +       if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> +               buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Initialize bm_flags based on the CPU cache properties
>   * On SMP it depends on cache configuration
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index 01b2656..31a4281 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
>         buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
>         buf[1] = 1;
>
> -       /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> -       buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
> -
>         /* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
>         arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
>  }
> @@ -282,7 +279,7 @@ static struct acpi_object_list *acpi_processor_alloc_pdc(void)
>                 return NULL;
>         }
>
> -       buf = kmalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       buf = kzalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!buf) {
>                 printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
>                 kfree(obj);
> @@ -310,20 +307,6 @@ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in)
>  {
>         acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>
> -       if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> -               /*
> -                * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> -                * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> -                * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> -                */
> -               union acpi_object *obj;
> -               u32 *buffer = NULL;
> -
> -               obj = pdc_in->pointer;
> -               buffer = (u32 *)(obj->buffer.pointer);
> -               buffer[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> -
> -       }
>         status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL);
>
>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ