| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52F87B1D.7090401@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:09:17 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Lan Tianyu <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-acpi <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff
to make it more arch-independent
Hi Tianyu,
On 2014年02月10日 10:21, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2014-02-08 21:10 GMT+08:00 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>:
>> _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
>> rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
>> in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +----
>> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 19 +------------------
>> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 19 +------------------
>> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index d651102..d2b8b9d 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -152,10 +152,7 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
>> #endif
>>
>> static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
>> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
>> -{
>> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
>> -}
>> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>>
>> #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
>> index 07d209c..d71f64a 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
>> @@ -1014,3 +1014,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unregister_ioapic);
>> * TBD when when IA64 starts to support suspend...
>> */
>> int acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void) { return 0; }
>> +
>> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
>> +{
>> + /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
>> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
> Hi Hanjun:
> You can write like this.
> buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD | ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
Thanks for the suggestion, will update it.
>
>> + if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
>> + /*
>> + * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
>> + * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
>> + * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
>> + */
>> + buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
>> +
>> + }
>> +
>> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index c8c1e70..e9f71bc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -147,24 +147,7 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
>> c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
>> -{
>> - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>> -
>> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
>> -
>> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
>> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
>> -
>> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
>> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
>> - */
>> - if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
>> - buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
>> -}
>> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>>
>> #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
>> index e69182f..aa9aed9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,37 @@
>> #include <asm/mwait.h>
>> #include <asm/special_insns.h>
>>
>> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
>> +
>> + /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
>> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
>> + if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
>> + /*
>> + * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
>> + * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
>> + * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
>> + */
>> + buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
>> +
>> + }
>> +
>> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> This is not right. ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP contians ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH and
> ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH. boot_option_idle_override is meaningless here.
>
> You should keep original order and put the check at last.
Good catch! I will update this patch, thanks for your review :)
Best regards
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists