lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140211071225.GA27870@lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:12:25 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/compaction: disallow high-order page for
 migration target

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:26:34PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:08:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Purpose of compaction is to get a high order page. Currently, if we find
> > high-order page while searching migration target page, we break it to
> > order-0 pages and use them as migration target. It is contrary to purpose
> > of compaction, so disallow high-order page to be used for
> > migration target.
> > 
> > Additionally, clean-up logic in suitable_migration_target() to simply.
> > There is no functional changes from this clean-up.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > index 3a91a2e..bbe1260 100644
> > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > @@ -217,21 +217,12 @@ static inline bool compact_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock,
> >  /* Returns true if the page is within a block suitable for migration to */
> >  static bool suitable_migration_target(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	int migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> > -
> > -	/* Don't interfere with memory hot-remove or the min_free_kbytes blocks */
> > -	if (migratetype == MIGRATE_RESERVE)
> > -		return false;
> > -
> 
> Why is this check removed? The reservation blocks are preserved as
> short-lived high-order atomic allocations depend on them.

Hello,

After disallowing high-order page to be used for migration target,
we only allow pages from movable or CMA pageblock for migration target on
migrate_async_suitable() check. So checking whether page comes from reserve or
isolate pageblock is useless.

> 
> > -	if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
> > -		return false;
> > -
> 
> Why is this check removed?
> 
> > -	/* If the page is a large free page, then allow migration */
> > +	/* If the page is a large free page, then disallow migration */
> >  	if (PageBuddy(page) && page_order(page) >= pageblock_order)
> > -		return true;
> > +		return false;
> >  
> 
> The reason why this was originally allowed was to allow pageblocks that were
> marked MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE or MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE to be used as compaction
> targets. However, compaction should not even be running if this is the
> case so the change makes sense.

Okay!

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ