[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMwXhOaJoYgrtBuXgZO3PGym+-ndNrrN2NGTX90vWZWTuG=Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:39:40 +0000
From: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
To: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 11 February 2014 15:40, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org> wrote:
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +struct max665x_dev {
>>>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>>>> + struct mutex iolock;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + struct i2c_client *i2c;
>>>>>> + struct regmap *map;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + int type;
>>>>>
>>>>> Unnecessary extra lines above could be removed.
>>>>
>>>> I prefer it that way, but I will remove the two extra lines as you wish.
>>>
>>> As I already said, these are just nits and only since you were
>>> re-spinning the patch,
>>> I suggested them. Also, since this is a new file being added, it
>>> avoids further patches
>>> doing these same things.
>>
>> Well, it is worse in my opinion because it makes the code more bloated
>> without separation between units, but I made the requested change
>> anyway because the feature matters lotta more to me than this styling.
>> Hope it is OK now?
>
> The only thing that you missed among what you agreed to change is the
> arrangement of
> "depends on" and "select" in Kconfig. Rest look OK. Thanks for taking care.
Ah, true. I will do that tomorrow if it is a blocker for the integration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists