linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK9yfHxzLbENXz60oFTHfp6NmhyyjPavKstrBbrGw_KwjKFYkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:12:44 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

On 11 February 2014 17:09, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 11 February 2014 15:40, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org> wrote:
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +struct max665x_dev {
>>>>>>> +       struct device *dev;
>>>>>>> +       struct mutex iolock;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       struct i2c_client *i2c;
>>>>>>> +       struct regmap     *map;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +       int type;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unnecessary extra lines above could be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer it that way, but I will remove the two extra lines as you wish.
>>>>
>>>> As I already said, these are just nits and only since you were
>>>> re-spinning the patch,
>>>> I suggested them. Also, since this is a new file being added, it
>>>> avoids further patches
>>>> doing these same things.
>>>
>>> Well, it is worse in my opinion because it makes the code more bloated
>>> without separation between units, but I made the requested change
>>> anyway because the feature matters lotta more to me than this styling.
>>> Hope it is OK now?
>>
>> The only thing that you missed among what you agreed to change is the
>> arrangement of
>> "depends on" and "select" in Kconfig. Rest look OK. Thanks for taking care.
>
> Ah, true. I will do that tomorrow if it is a blocker for the integration.

I don't think it is a blocker in any way and you may choose to ignore
it as well.

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/