lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1392148802.9682.36.camel@x220>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:00:02 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drm/msm: CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM?

On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 12:29 -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > Commit 55459968176f ("drm/msm: add a330/apq8x74") added preprocessor
> > checks for CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM. But I couldn't find a Kconfig symbol
> > MSM_OCMEM (nor a preprocessor define for a macro of that name). Why were
> > those preprocessor checks added?
> 
> At the moment, CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM is only in downstream kernel.. not
> 100% sure about how we'll handle that upstream when there is more than
> just drm/msm using OCMEM (which can be shared between gpu, video
> enc/dec, etc).

I see. (Wouldn't that be an upstream kernel, actually?)

> > Please note that lines 197-201 currently read:
> >     /* Set the OCMEM base address for A330, etc */
> >     if (a3xx_gpu->ocmem_hdl) {
> >             gpu_write(gpu, REG_A3XX_RB_GMEM_BASE_ADDR,
> >                     (unsigned int)(a3xx_gpu->ocmem_base >> 14));
> >     }
> >
> > ocmem_hdl and ocmem_base are used uninitialized here, aren't they? So it
> > seems these lines should be wrapped with a preprocessor check for
> > CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM too.
> 
> in this case ocmem_hdl will be NULL (since a3xx_gpu is kzalloc'd).
> The #ifdef's could be added here, but not required.

I missed that. So whether or not to #ifdef this would be mostly a matter
of style.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ