linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMwXhNWyLakYpkcuDLh5+yThjtrPkmcRDd8TQrStEDcuMO7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:34:28 +0000
From:	Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> >> +       max665x->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &max665x_regmap_config);
>> >
>> > Don't you need to check the return value of devm_regmap_init_i2c?
>>
>> I personally think I should. I strived for consistency though with
>> other similar drivers. After this many reviews about such things, it
>> seems that consistency matters here less than other projects which I
>> can cope with, thanks.
>
> The right thing to do is normally preferred.

Yes, sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/