linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140212191649.GC1631@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:16:49 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
> >and ready to go.  Not so with these releases.  Maybe it's the horrid
> >weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
> >something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
> >screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
> >the build every other patch.  Some developers decided to get into the
> >act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
> >patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
> >times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
> >take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...
> >
> >Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
> >trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
> >run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.
> >
> >You have been warned.
> >
> >-----------------
> >
> 
> Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. No
> dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in
> warn.

Great, thanks for testing all 4 of these, I feel better about them now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/