linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMwXhPsQPvPn+kmBXyGq3WqsGhxTR2w1YjTzNbTyrEyxVHWxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:14:11 +0000
From:	Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
>> > +const struct regmap_config max665x_regmap_config = {
>> > +   .reg_bits = 5,
>> > +};
>>
>> This would normally be static too, and I'd *really* expect to see a
>> val_bits set here.  I'm a bit surprised this works without one.
>
> Mark (privately) mentioned to me that this patch can't possibly work
> given the current Regmap configuration.

Strange because I have tested the change, although not for days and
weeks. What exactly cannot possible work?

> Patches are accepted into
> Mainline based on the premise that they are fully tested and working,
> _prior_ to submitting [1].

Yes, I am aware of it, hence the quick testing done.

> It's also pretty pointless having an MFD driver without any
> children,

Agree.

> so unless (at least one of) the child device drivers have
> been accepted by pull-time, your work will not be part of the
> pull-request headed for Mainline.

Sure, I think that is reasonable.

> Please inform me of your plans as you with to proceed.

I already sent the hwmon changes to the maintainers - you included or
linked -, but got no response so far. I am all for making it work
ASAP. I will make a more thorough testing today or tomorrow. After
that, it is up to them...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/