[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0mlhxfnhx8.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:36:35 -0500
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> Oh! You are saying that if the kernel only *supports* signed modules,
> and you load a module that is not signed, it will taint the kernel?
Yes: this is the default for several distros.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists