linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local memory and limit readahead pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140213130643.0cf5fb083056cdd159d1aac4@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:06:43 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Damien Ramonda <damien.ramonda@...el.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local
 memory and limit readahead pages

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:05:31 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> 
> > I was able to test (1) implementation on the system where readahead problem
> > occurred. Unfortunately it did not help.
> > 
> > Reason seem to be that CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES dependency of
> > numa_mem_id(). The PPC machine I am facing problem has topology like
> > this:
> > 
> > numactl -H
> > ---------
> > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
> > ...
> > node 0 size: 0 MB
> > node 0 free: 0 MB
> > node 1 cpus: 8 9 10 11 32 33 34 35 ...
> > node 1 size: 8071 MB
> > node 1 free: 2479 MB
> > node distances:
> > node   0   1
> >   0:  10  20
> >   1:  20  10
> > 
> > So it seems numa_mem_id() does not help for all the configs..
> > Am I missing something ?
> > 
> 
> You need the patch from http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=139093411119013 
> first.

That (un-signed-off) powerpc patch appears to be moribund.  What's up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/