[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FD4B97.9020306@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:47:51 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@....fi>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 tip 0/7] 64-bit BPF insn set and tracing filters
On 02/13/2014 02:44 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Well, if that would be the case, then seccomp would have had JIT support
> long ago. ;-) Right now BPF filters with seccomp are not JIT compiled
> for _any_ architecture.
>
Really, I was under the impression there were. They *should be*, that
was an important concept in the development of the seccomp filters.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists