[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402181717300.20073@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:20:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: x86_pmu_start WARN_ON.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Enable CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER for better stack traces; I suspect the
> > list_del_event() is just random stack garbage. The path that makes sense
> > is:
> > wait_rcu()->__wait_for_common()->schedule_timeout()
>
> Here's an updated stack trace on 3.14-rc3 with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> enabled, in case it's helpful:
Still chasing this, although all I can add are these debug messages:
[ 140.812003] PROBLEM: n_events=2 n_added=2 VMW: idx=33 state=f00 type=0 config=0 samp_per=5e6069eb0
[ 140.812003] ALL: VMW: Num=0 idx=33 state=f00 type=0 config=0 samp_per=5e6069eb0
[ 140.812003] ALL: VMW: Num=1 idx=0 state=3 type=0 config=1 samp_per=0
So when the WARN gets triggered there only only two events in the event
list, the NMI watchdog which has already been enabled somehow (that f00
I stuck in, pmu_start sets it to f00 instead of 00 to make sure it wasn't
something stomping on memory) and the precise instructions event.
I still have a hard time following what all the schedule in code is doing.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists