linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:12:27 +0100
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
CC:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53

op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
> to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
> acpi_check_dsm() interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi Maarten,
> 	Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether
> this patch fixes the regression?
>
Tested-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>

I was wrong about the operator precedence, seems correct after all. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/