linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:12:09 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
CC:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53



On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
>> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
>> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
>> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
>> to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
>> acpi_check_dsm() interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Hi Maarten,
>>     Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether
>> this patch fixes the regression?
>>
> Tested-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
> 
> I was wrong about the operator precedence, seems correct after all. :-)
Hi Maarten,
	Thanks for testing.
Cheers!
Gerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/