linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty/serial: deal with 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:06:40 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty/serial: deal with 8250_core.c uninitialized
 warning for good

On 02/19/2014 09:00 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Every couple of months, someone sends a patch to fix:
> 
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c: In function 'serial_unlink_irq_chain':
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:1712:2: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> 
> and they in turn get a NACK for their efforts, and are told that
> their compiler is broken.  This has been going on since at least
> the year 2008:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/24/433
> 
> Lets add a comment, so that subsequent patches don't get as far as
> the maintainers or the mailing lists.

Hi, wouldn't hlist_for_each_entry do a better job to silent both the
compiler and the reporters with the added value of cleanup?

> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> index 69932b7556cf..747073b8c38a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> @@ -1694,6 +1694,10 @@ static int serial_link_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  
>  static void serial_unlink_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * yes, some broken gcc emit "warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized"
> +	 * but no, we are not going to take a patch that assigns NULL below.
> +	 */
>  	struct irq_info *i;
>  	struct hlist_node *n;
>  	struct hlist_head *h;

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/