lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402181823420.20791@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:24:36 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	riel@...hat.com
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, peterz@...radead.org, chegu_vinod@...com,
	aarcange@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] move mmu notifier call from change_protection
 to change_pmd_range

On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, riel@...hat.com wrote:

> From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> 
> The NUMA scanning code can end up iterating over many gigabytes
> of unpopulated memory, especially in the case of a freshly started
> KVM guest with lots of memory.
> 
> This results in the mmu notifier code being called even when
> there are no mapped pages in a virtual address range. The amount
> of time wasted can be enough to trigger soft lockup warnings
> with very large KVM guests.
> 
> This patch moves the mmu notifier call to the pmd level, which
> represents 1GB areas of memory on x86-64. Furthermore, the mmu
> notifier code is only called from the address in the PMD where
> present mappings are first encountered.
> 
> The hugetlbfs code is left alone for now; hugetlb mappings are
> not relocatable, and as such are left alone by the NUMA code,
> and should never trigger this problem to begin with.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Xing Gang <gang.xing@...com>
> Tested-by: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

Might have been cleaner to move the 
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_{start,end}() to hugetlb_change_protection() 
as well, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ