[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-411cf180fa00521f9bfb1d022e3ebf059a2d299f@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:12:42 -0800
From: tip-bot for Stephane Eranian <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/uncore: fix initialization of cpumask
Commit-ID: 411cf180fa00521f9bfb1d022e3ebf059a2d299f
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/411cf180fa00521f9bfb1d022e3ebf059a2d299f
Author: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:20:07 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:49:07 +0100
perf/x86/uncore: fix initialization of cpumask
On certain processors, the uncore PMU boxes may only be
msr-bsed or PCI-based. But in both cases, the cpumask,
suggesting on which CPUs to monitor to get full coverage
of the particular PMU, must be created.
However with the current code base, the cpumask was only
created on processor which had at least one MSR-based
uncore PMU. This patch removes that restriction and
ensures the cpumask is created even when there is no
msr-based PMU. For instance, on SNB client where only
a PCI-based memory controller PMU is supported.
Cc: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: acme@...hat.com
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com
Cc: zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392132015-14521-2-git-send-email-eranian@google.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 29c2487..fe4255b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static void __init uncore_cpu_setup(void *dummy)
static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
{
- int ret, cpu, max_cores;
+ int ret, max_cores;
max_cores = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
@@ -3808,29 +3808,6 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- get_online_cpus();
-
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
-
- for_each_cpu(i, &uncore_cpu_mask) {
- if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
- phys_id = -1;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (phys_id < 0)
- continue;
-
- uncore_cpu_prepare(cpu, phys_id);
- uncore_event_init_cpu(cpu);
- }
- on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
-
- register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
-
- put_online_cpus();
-
return 0;
}
@@ -3859,6 +3836,41 @@ static int __init uncore_pmus_register(void)
return 0;
}
+static void uncore_cpumask_init(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ /*
+ * ony invoke once from msr or pci init code
+ */
+ if (!cpumask_empty(&uncore_cpu_mask))
+ return;
+
+ get_online_cpus();
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ int i, phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
+
+ for_each_cpu(i, &uncore_cpu_mask) {
+ if (phys_id == topology_physical_package_id(i)) {
+ phys_id = -1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (phys_id < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ uncore_cpu_prepare(cpu, phys_id);
+ uncore_event_init_cpu(cpu);
+ }
+ on_each_cpu(uncore_cpu_setup, NULL, 1);
+
+ register_cpu_notifier(&uncore_cpu_nb);
+
+ put_online_cpus();
+}
+
+
static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -3877,6 +3889,7 @@ static int __init intel_uncore_init(void)
uncore_pci_exit();
goto fail;
}
+ uncore_cpumask_init();
uncore_pmus_register();
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists