[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5307C2A2.5010006@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:18:26 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>,
Andy Honig <ahonig@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kaslr: randomize module base load address
On 02/21/2014 01:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> I've been slapped down for adding more config options in the past, and
>> I think it's unlikely that people using CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE won't
>> want the modules base randomized too. I think this is a safe default,
>> but if you see it as a requirement, I can change it.
>
> I think there were issues with some embedded systems where it's
> hard/impossible to provide/alter boot parameters.
>
We now allow kernel parameters to be compiled into the kernel image for
that reason.
>
> btw, would it be better to make each module have its own offset rather
> than using the same offset for all of them? That could cause problems
> with vmap space fragmentation I guess.
>
... but it would improve the amount of entropy.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists