linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.12-rt19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402232211300.21251@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Sun, 23 Feb 2014 22:13:21 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru>
cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.12-rt19

On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
> 23.02.2014 23:13, Pavel Vasilyev пишет:
> 
> > But not  -rt1, -rt2, -rt3 -rt4, .... -rt99
> 
> Or
> 
> 3.12-rt1,
> 3.12-rt2,
> ...
> 3.12-rt33,
> ...
> 3.12-rt111,
> ...
> 3.12-rt999
> ...
> 
> Now, to have to roll back all my changes, then work -rt patch,
> then impose SUBLEVEL mainline diff, then last -rt patch, then my сhanges.

So we need a different numbering scheme just because your workflow is
completely backwards?

Thanks,

	tglx