[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530A7C58.2060009@pavlinux.ru>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 02:55:20 +0400
From: Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.12-rt19
24.02.2014 01:13, Thomas Gleixner пишет:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
>> 23.02.2014 23:13, Pavel Vasilyev пишет:
>>
>>> But not -rt1, -rt2, -rt3 -rt4, .... -rt99
>>
>> Or
>>
>> 3.12-rt1,
>> 3.12-rt2,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt33,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt111,
>> ...
>> 3.12-rt999
>> ...
>>
>> Now, to have to roll back all my changes, then work -rt patch,
>> then impose SUBLEVEL mainline diff, then last -rt patch, then my сhanges.
>
> So we need a different numbering scheme just because your workflow is
> completely backwards?
No, because in positional number systems, an increase in the senior level,
junior reset, but not stays the same. Mainline kernel and patches is senior level.
--
Pavel.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists