linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Avoid kasprintf/kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:49:53 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Avoid kasprintf/kfree

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> Avoid an unnecessary allocation/free by using stack instead.
>
> Signed-off-by; Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>

Hm.

> +       char propname[9 + sizeof(int) * 2 + 4] = "pinctrl-";

If you absolutely want to do this you have to

#define PINCTRL_PREFIX "pinctrl-"

char propname[strlen(PINCTRL_PREFIX) + sizeof(int)*2 + 4] = PINCTRL_PREFIX;

Then add a comment above stating why you add 4.

> This allocation seems unnecessary and the kasprintf isn't
> checked for non-null, so maybe this is better.

Another option would be to just add a NULL-check? This is
definately not on a performance-critical path.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/