[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393265785.11020.40.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:16:25 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Avoid kasprintf/kfree
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 10:49 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > Avoid an unnecessary allocation/free by using stack instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by; Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> Hm.
>
> > + char propname[9 + sizeof(int) * 2 + 4] = "pinctrl-";
>
> If you absolutely want to do this you have to
>
> #define PINCTRL_PREFIX "pinctrl-"
>
> char propname[strlen(PINCTRL_PREFIX) + sizeof(int)*2 + 4] = PINCTRL_PREFIX;
>
> Then add a comment above stating why you add 4.
No, I don't really.
> > This allocation seems unnecessary and the kasprintf isn't
> > checked for non-null, so maybe this is better.
>
> Another option would be to just add a NULL-check? This is
> definately not on a performance-critical path.
It's a defect not to check the kasprintf return before
writing through it.
I submitted what I think appropriate.
Fix it as you choose. Or not.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists