[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530B4767.9010109@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:21:43 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: iosf_mbi: Provide dummy functions if CONFIG_IOSF_MBI
not set
On 02/24/2014 05:19 AM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> Other than _available I would have expected all the others to resolve to
> returning an error or doing a WARN() in the not compiled in case.
>
WARN() or BUG()?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists