[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8761o24md5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:21:50 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> Going on a tangent here - our use case is using backported upstream
> kernel modules (https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/) for delivering a
> driver to people who decided that they absolutely need to run with some
> random kernel (e.g. 3.10) but we don't yet support all the driver
> features they want/need in the kernel they picked.
Ah, a user! See, that's not the "I forgot to sign my modules" case the
others were complaining about.
> We push our code upstream as soon as we can and typically only diverge
> from upstream by a few patches, so saying things like "crap" or "felony
> law breaker" about out-of-tree modules in general makes me furious.
Appreciated and understood.
I have applied Mathieu's patch to my pending tree, with Ingo's Nack
recorded.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists