linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1548442707.30678.1393419320104.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:55:20 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new
 TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "David
> Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:51:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> 
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> > Going on a tangent here - our use case is using backported upstream
> > kernel modules (https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/) for delivering a
> > driver to people who decided that they absolutely need to run with some
> > random kernel (e.g. 3.10) but we don't yet support all the driver
> > features they want/need in the kernel they picked.
> 
> Ah, a user!  See, that's not the "I forgot to sign my modules" case the
> others were complaining about.
> 
> > We push our code upstream as soon as we can and typically only diverge
> > from upstream by a few patches, so saying things like "crap" or "felony
> > law breaker" about out-of-tree modules in general makes me furious.
> 
> Appreciated and understood.
> 
> I have applied Mathieu's patch to my pending tree, with Ingo's Nack
> recorded.

Hi Rusty,

That RFC patch was superseded by a newer version, posted in a separate thread.
There were documentation and other printout sites to update. I posted the
non-RFC version of the patch here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/4

(you should have it in your inbox)

Please let me know if I need to repost it.

Thanks!

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/