[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140226145246.GA23022@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:52:46 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, greg@...ah.com,
jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] kexec: Create a relocatable object called purgatory
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:09:34PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 10:20 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >
> > Please let me know if you don't like the idea and you still think there
> > should be a shared implementation between arch/x86/boot/ and
> > arch/x86/purgatory/.
> >
>
> That is what I would *prefer*. There are some other string functions in
> arch/x86/boot/string.c which also ought to be sharable (and are in
> places already.)
>
Ok, I will look into it. Possibly move optimized 32bit and 64bit version of
memcpy in arch/x86/boot/string.c and include it in purgaotry files.
Or we could define new C version of routines in boot/string.c and leave
optimized versions where they are.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists