linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:47:48 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
	jkosina@...e.cz, greg@...ah.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] kexec: A new system call, kexec_file_load, for in
 kernel kexec

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:35:19PM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> #define BIT(nr)                 (1UL << (nr))
> 
> For my part I'm not convinced it's a better way to do it, unless
> Borislav also wanted to suggest adding an enum for the bit number
> values...

Well,

#define KEXEC_FILE_UNLOAD	BIT(1)

is much more readable.

The enum thing is also nice to have but it's not my personal preference.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/