[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <FF42247A-A4E8-4AA2-9C3B-BEEFC2F61714@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:47 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform
On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
> Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> writes:
>
>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be
>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board
>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform.
>>
>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over
>> to mach-qcom.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>
> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change,
> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name.
>
> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo
> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also?
>
> Kevin
No reason, just wasn’t aware and no one said anything til now. Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup?
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists