[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hbnxtwk7l.fsf@paris.lan>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:10 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> writes:
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be
>>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board
>>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform.
>>>
>>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over
>>> to mach-qcom.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change,
>> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name.
>>
>> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo
>> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also?
>>
>> Kevin
>
> No reason, just wasn’t aware and no one said anything til now.
Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner.
> Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup?
Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists