linux-kernel - Re: The sheer number of sparse warnings in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1393462087.24588.50.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:48:07 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The sheer number of sparse warnings in the kernel

On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 14:49 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The number of sparse errors in the current kernel is staggering, and it
> makes sparse a lot less valuable of a tool that it otherwise could be.
> On a build of x86-64 allyesconfig I'm getting 20,676 sparse messages.
> Out of those, 12,358 come from linux/err.h.  Given that the latter
> basically spams *everything*, I can only conclude that almost noone uses
> sparse unless they have a filter script.
> 
> So a lot of these are certainly nuisance problems, like the
> <linux/err.h> stuff which has to do with the handling of error values,
> but some of these look like real bugs.
> 
> What do we need to do to actually make our tools be able to do work for
> us?  Newbie projects to clean up?  Trying to get the larger Linux
> companies to put resources on it?

gcc 4.8 does annoyingly warn on all unsigned/signed
mismatches/implicit conversions too.

err.h could also return bool instead of long for the
IS_ERR and IS_ERR_OR_NULL tests.

Maybe something like this could be useful.

Shut up the unsigned<->signed pointer conversions
and implicit conversions in the Makefile.

Use bool not long for IS_ERR and IS_ERR_OR_NULL

Update the dentry description of kernel pointers
left over from 2002's move to err.h

unsigned...

---
 Makefile            | 1 +
 include/linux/err.h | 7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index fce2ba7..a9c11c4 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ KBUILD_CPPFLAGS := -D__KERNEL__
 KBUILD_CFLAGS   := -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
 		   -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
 		   -Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
+		   -Wno-sign-conversion -Wno-pointer-sign \
 		   -Wno-format-security \
 		   -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
 KBUILD_AFLAGS_KERNEL :=
diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h
index 15f92e0..a729120 100644
--- a/include/linux/err.h
+++ b/include/linux/err.h
@@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
 #define _LINUX_ERR_H
 
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
 
 #include <asm/errno.h>
 
 /*
  * Kernel pointers have redundant information, so we can use a
- * scheme where we can return either an error code or a dentry
+ * scheme where we can return either an error code or a normal
  * pointer with the same return value.
  *
  * This should be a per-architecture thing, to allow different
@@ -29,12 +30,12 @@ static inline long __must_check PTR_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
 	return (long) ptr;
 }
 
-static inline long __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
+static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr)
 {
 	return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
 }
 
-static inline long __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
+static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
 {
 	return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr);
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/