lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140227164051.GA25183@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:40:51 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Reza Snowdon <rs@...e.me.uk>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, speakup@...ille.uwo.ca,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: buffers: Fixed a return value coding
 style issue.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:42PM +0000, Reza Snowdon wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reza Snowdon <rs@...e.me.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> index 382973e..8d7caa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ static int synth_buffer_free(void)
>  
>  int synth_buffer_empty(void)
>  {
> -	return (buff_in == buff_out);
> +	int buff_comparison = (buff_in == buff_out);
> +	return buff_comparison;

What's wrong with the original code here?  If anything, just drop the
(), but really, it's fine, leave it alone, it's obvious what is
happening is ok.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ