[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140227164051.GA25183@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:40:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Reza Snowdon <rs@...e.me.uk>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, speakup@...ille.uwo.ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: buffers: Fixed a return value coding
style issue.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:42PM +0000, Reza Snowdon wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reza Snowdon <rs@...e.me.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> index 382973e..8d7caa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ static int synth_buffer_free(void)
>
> int synth_buffer_empty(void)
> {
> - return (buff_in == buff_out);
> + int buff_comparison = (buff_in == buff_out);
> + return buff_comparison;
What's wrong with the original code here? If anything, just drop the
(), but really, it's fine, leave it alone, it's obvious what is
happening is ok.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists