[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530F8020.3040000@mage.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:12:48 +0000
From: "rs@...e.me.uk" <rs@...e.me.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, speakup@...ille.uwo.ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: speakup: buffers: Fixed a return value coding
style issue.
When checking buffers.c with checkpatch.pl it throws the following
error: drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c:58: ERROR: return is not a
function, parentheses are not required
I watched one of your talks, it's very informative and concise:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLBrBBImJt4&feature=youtu.be
Thanks,
Reza Snowdon
On 27/02/14 16:40, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:26:42PM +0000, Reza Snowdon wrote:
>> Fixed a coding style issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reza Snowdon <rs@...e.me.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
>> index 382973e..8d7caa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/buffers.c
>> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ static int synth_buffer_free(void)
>>
>> int synth_buffer_empty(void)
>> {
>> - return (buff_in == buff_out);
>> + int buff_comparison = (buff_in == buff_out);
>> + return buff_comparison;
>
> What's wrong with the original code here? If anything, just drop the
> (), but really, it's fine, leave it alone, it's obvious what is
> happening is ok.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Regards,
Reza Snowdon
View attachment "0001-Staging-speakup-buffers-Fixed-a-return-coding-style-.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (981 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists