[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140228211733.GK11910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:17:33 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer compiled for x32 causes reboot
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:54:09PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:47:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > I'll try your patch momentarily, first I had some other changes I started
> > > > running before I left work (for some reason it recompiled the whole
> > > > kernel).
> > > >
> > > > 8: function: perf_output_begin
> > > > 8: bprint: perf_output_begin: VMW: event type 2 config 2a st: 2c3e
> > > > 8: bputs: perf_output_begin: VMW: before rcu_dereference
> > > > 9: function: __do_page_fault
> > > > 9: function: down_read_trylock
> > > > 9: function: _cond_resched
> > > > 9: function: find_vma
> > > >
> > > > so it looks like the fault happens
> > > >
> > > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > >
> > > > 116 /*
> > > > 117 * For inherited events we send all the output towards the parent.
> > > > 118 */
> > > > 119 if (event->parent)
> > > > 120 event = event->parent;
> > > > 121
> > > >
> > > > somewhere between here
> > > >
> > > > 122 rb = rcu_dereference(event->rb);
> > > > 123 if (unlikely(!rb))
> > > > 124 goto out;
> > > >
> > > > and here
> > > >
> > > > 125
> > > > 126 if (unlikely(!rb->nr_pages))
> > > > 127 goto out;
> > > >
> > > > although if rcu locks do anything to turn off tracing then this could be
> > > > suspect.
> > >
> > > The most likely suspect is of course event->rb in the rcu_dereference.
> > > I have to defer to Steven on how rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
> > > currently interact with tracing. ;-)
> >
> > These are all perf related. You'll need to defer to Peter Zijlstra ;-)
>
> I'm lost.. :/
>
> pretty much all perf objects are RCU freed.
This code isn't running in idle context is it? If so, RCU will happily
free out from under it. CONFIG_PROVE_RCU should detect this sort of thing,
though.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists