[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8945263.cDODqBSQxb@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:26:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: stats: Remove redundant cpufreq_cpu_get() call
On Friday, February 28, 2014 09:18:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 February 2014 07:28, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > __cpufreq_stats_create_table always gets pass the valid and real policy
> > struct. So, there's no need to call cpufreq_cpu_get() to get the policy
> > again.
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 12 +-----------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> All patches look fine now. Rafael you can queue them up as per your
> convenience.
>
> @Saravana: Though I am quite sure you still need my patches to get
> your initial issue fixed. So, can you please get them tested as early
> as possible, so that we can get them in for 3.14?
That's a bit late ...
> @Srivatsa: Your reviews will also help :)
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists