[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomjtE7Rtrs-TgxtSo658+4p0AHLzr9niN1GnkkrDqTxTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:18:02 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: stats: Remove redundant cpufreq_cpu_get() call
On 28 February 2014 07:28, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> __cpufreq_stats_create_table always gets pass the valid and real policy
> struct. So, there's no need to call cpufreq_cpu_get() to get the policy
> again.
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
All patches look fine now. Rafael you can queue them up as per your
convenience.
@Saravana: Though I am quite sure you still need my patches to get
your initial issue fixed. So, can you please get them tested as early
as possible, so that we can get them in for 3.14?
@Srivatsa: Your reviews will also help :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists