lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADbOyBSMG_a=2qPmM0EU1LEd7y1ZxrpLuoz4MHroX6ri4-nJ3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:17:58 +0100
From:	Elias Vanderstuyft <elias.vds@...il.com>
To:	Michal MalĂ˝ <madcatxster@...fuk.cz>
Cc:	Felix Rueegg <felix.rueegg@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: ff-memless: don't schedule already playing effect
 to play again

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Felix Rueegg <felix.rueegg@...il.com> wrote:
> When an effect with zero replay length, zero replay delay
> and zero envelope attack length is uploaded, it is played and then scheduled to play
> again one timer tick later. This triggers a warning (URB submitted while
> active) in combination with the xpad driver.
>
> Skipping the rescheduling of this effect fixes the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Rueegg <felix.rueegg@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/ff-memless.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/ff-memless.c b/drivers/input/ff-memless.c
> index 74c0d8c..2e06948 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/ff-memless.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/ff-memless.c
> @@ -139,10 +139,13 @@ static void ml_schedule_timer(struct ml_device *ml)
>                 if (!test_bit(FF_EFFECT_STARTED, &state->flags))
>                         continue;
>
> -               if (test_bit(FF_EFFECT_PLAYING, &state->flags))
> +               if (test_bit(FF_EFFECT_PLAYING, &state->flags)) {
>                         next_at = calculate_next_time(state);
> -               else
> +                       if (next_at == now)
> +                               continue;
> +               } else {
>                         next_at = state->play_at;
> +               }
>
>                 if (time_before_eq(now, next_at) &&
>                     (++events == 1 || time_before(next_at, earliest)))
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> --

@Michal: Is ff-memless-next also affected by this problem?

Elias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ