[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53159791.5080205@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:06:25 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] of: Implement simplified graph binding for single
port devices
On 27/02/14 19:35, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> For simple devices with only one port, it can be made implicit.
> The endpoint node can be a direct child of the device node.
<snip>
> @@ -2105,9 +2112,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(
> /* Get remote endpoint node. */
> np = of_parse_phandle(node, "remote-endpoint", 0);
>
> - /* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node. */
> + /* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node */
> for (depth = 3; depth && np; depth--) {
> np = of_get_next_parent(np);
> + if (depth == 3 && of_node_cmp(np->name, "port"))
> + break;
> if (depth == 2 && of_node_cmp(np->name, "ports"))
> break;
> }
This function becomes a bit funny. Would it be clearer just to do
something like:
np = of_parse_phandle(node, "remote-endpoint", 0);
np = of_get_next_parent(np);
if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "port") != 0)
return np;
np = of_get_next_parent(np);
if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "ports") != 0)
return np;
np = of_get_next_parent(np);
return np;
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists