linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] of: Implement simplified graph binding for single port devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1393927459.3917.2.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:04:19 +0100
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] of: Implement simplified graph binding for
 single port devices

Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2014, 11:06 +0200 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
> On 27/02/14 19:35, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > For simple devices with only one port, it can be made implicit.
> > The endpoint node can be a direct child of the device node.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > @@ -2105,9 +2112,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(
> >  	/* Get remote endpoint node. */
> >  	np = of_parse_phandle(node, "remote-endpoint", 0);
> >  
> > -	/* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node. */
> > +	/* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node */
> >  	for (depth = 3; depth && np; depth--) {
> >  		np = of_get_next_parent(np);
> > +		if (depth == 3 && of_node_cmp(np->name, "port"))
> > +			break;
> >  		if (depth == 2 && of_node_cmp(np->name, "ports"))
> >  			break;
> >  	}
> 
> This function becomes a bit funny. Would it be clearer just to do
> something like:
> 
> 	np = of_parse_phandle(node, "remote-endpoint", 0);
> 
> 	np = of_get_next_parent(np);
> 	if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "port") != 0)
> 		return np;
> 
> 	np = of_get_next_parent(np);
> 	if (of_node_cmp(np->name, "ports") != 0)
> 		return np;
> 
> 	np = of_get_next_parent(np);
> 	return np;

I'm not sure if this was initially crafted to reduce the number of
function calls, but rolled out it certainly is easier to read. I'll
change this as you suggest.

thanks
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/