lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1394099815.4592.8.camel@x220> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:56:55 +0100 From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NVMe: silence GCC warning on 32 bit On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 08:09 -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > Looks good to me. Thanks. > This won't apply in linux-nvme yet and it may be a > little while before it does, so this might be considered to go upstream > through a different tree if you want this in sooner. These warnings popped up in v3.14-rc1. (In v3.13 bvprv was a pointer initialized to NULL.) This patch is not urgent, but it would still be nice if the warnings were silenced in v3.14, since they are so noisy. Is there any tree that queues NVMe fixes to be applied during this release cycle? > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Paul Bolle wrote: > > bvprv? Would that mean bio_vec private? But it looks like some temporary > > variable, so something like tmp may make more sense. Anyhow, still > > compile tested only (on 32 and 64 bit x86). > > bvprv == bio_vec previous Thanks. So perhaps that variable could be renamed to previous (or its more common alias prev), Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists