[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3916368.BifXucqhsP@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:32:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Kieran Clancy <clancy.kieran@...il.com>
Cc: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
Juan Manuel Cabo <juanmanuel.cabo@...il.com>,
Dennis Jansen <dennis.jansen@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / EC: Clear stale EC events on Samsung systems
On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:54:28 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
> >>
> >> Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or
> >> will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline?
> >
> > I need to add a proper "CC stable" tag to your patch for this to happen.
> >
> > Which -stable kernels should it go to?
>
> 3.2 and 3.10 seem like natural choices (3.4?), but I don't know the
> norm for this kind of fix. Would there be any reason not to include it
> in some particular stable kernels?
In some cases patches are not needed in older -stable, because the
changes are not relevant there etc.
OK, I'll mark if for all applicable -stable series.
Thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists