lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:32:23 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <>
To:	Kieran Clancy <>
Cc:	Joseph Salisbury <>,
	Len Brown <>,,, Li Guang <>,
	Lan Tianyu <>,
	Juan Manuel Cabo <>,
	Dennis Jansen <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / EC: Clear stale EC events on Samsung systems

On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:54:28 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <> wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:04:14 AM Kieran Clancy wrote:
> >>
> >> Rafael, is it a separate process to get this in the stable tree or
> >> will it naturally happen after being merged into the mainline?
> >
> > I need to add a proper "CC stable" tag to your patch for this to happen.
> >
> > Which -stable kernels should it go to?
> 3.2 and 3.10 seem like natural choices (3.4?), but I don't know the
> norm for this kind of fix. Would there be any reason not to include it
> in some particular stable kernels?

In some cases patches are not needed in older -stable, because the
changes are not relevant there etc.

OK, I'll mark if for all applicable -stable series.


I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists